Best and Worst Cars for Your Commute

Sunday, July 20, 2008

 2008 Honda Accord
2008 Honda Accord

Commuting is tough. Gas prices are high, and thanks to increasing sprawl, the average American commute is now 30 minutes each way. If you're going to spend that much time and effort getting to work, you'd better being doing it in a nice ride.


The Best and Worst Cars for Commuting were chosen based on their gas mileage, comfort, safety and overall quality. At the top of the list are cars that'll get you to work in a good mood. At the bottom are cars that may make you decide the bus isn't so bad after all. With the exception of the Hummer H2, we generally applied our criteria to cars that you can buy new for under $30K. We also included an estimate, based on a 15-mile commute, current gas prices and each car's EPA-estimated combined gas mileage, of how you'll spend on gas to get to work each week. Here are some of the best and worst picks for your commute:


Top Picks:

#1 Honda Accord

MSRP: $20,360

Estimated Weekly Commute Cost: $27.31


The 2008 Honda Accord features a stretched wheelbase that provides ample leg room while on the road. It also has an optional voice-operated satellite-linked navigation system that can find gas stations, ATMs and restaurants -- using Zagat survey ratings. The Accord's optional Bluetooth is linked to the system, so once drivers find a restaurant, they can make reservations from the road.


#2 Mazda3

MSRP: $13,895

Estimated Weekly Commute Cost: $24.27


The sporty 2008 Mazda3 zips you to and from work while sipping gas. It averages 27 miles per gallon and is a blast to drive. Its bold styling sets it apart from the usual ho-hum commuter cars.


#3 Hyundai Elantra

MSRP: $13,625

Estimated Weekly Commute Cost: $23.40


With an MSRP of $13,625, the spacious Elantra is a steal for commuters on a budget. Although the interior styling is a bit on the conservative side, the car boasts generous front-seat room and receives high marks for safety.


#4 Honda CR-V

MSRP: $20,700

Estimated Weekly Commute Cost: $28.50


The 2008 Honda CR-V can conquer whatever your commute hands out, and then some. Road noise in the compact SUV is minimal and the SUV combines nimble handling with a comfortable ride.


 2008 Chevrolet Malibu
2008 Chevrolet Malibu

#5 Chevy Malibu

MSRP: $19,900

Estimated Weekly Commute Cost: $26.22


The Chevrolet Malibu, the 2008 North American Car of the Year, has a large cabin and driver-oriented cockpit. The Malibu also features a one-year subscription to OnStar, which can give turn-by-turn directions, find nearby restaurants and attractions, run remote diagnostics on the car and even contact help in an emergency.


#6 Subaru Legacy

MSRP: $20,495

Estimated Weekly Commute Cost: $29.79


Getting you to work in one piece is no problem for the 2008 Subaru Legacy Sedan, which is an Insurance Institute for Highway Safety "Top Safety Pick" for this year. The Legacy features Subaru's renowned all-wheel drive system, making it easy for you to get to work no matter what the weather.


Maybe Not For Every Day:

Pontiac G5

MSRP: $15,675

Estimated Weekly Commute Cost: $24.27


Reviewers say the interior of the 2008 Pontiac G5 is cheap and uncomfortable, which won't help you decompress after work. Add in poor handling, and it's clear the G5 would give any commuter a permanent case of the Mondays.


Hummer H2

MSRP: $57,425

Estimated Weekly Commute Cost: $65.55


Although the interior of the H2 is appealing and interior space is abundant, its enormous 6.2-liter V8 engine guzzles gas. In fact, many reviewers report gas mileage as low as 10 mpg. With a 32-gallon tank to fill and gas prices rising, the H2 makes taking the bus look very good.


Chevy TrailBlazer

MSRP: $27,745

Estimated Weekly Commute Cost: $38.55


Thanks to its poor reliability scores, the 2008 TrailBlazer is a great choice for commuters who enjoy being late, or not making it into work at all. With an estimated 14 miles per gallon city fuel economy, it's also a good choice for commuters who like to set fire to money.


Ford Ranger

MSRP: $14,490

Estimated Weekly Commute Cost: $28.50


The 2008 Ford Ranger is not a car you want to spend a lot of time in. Reviewers say its cabin is comfortable -- provided you're a Munchkinland native. Storage in the cabin is minimal and many complain the truck has a rough ride. All that plus the truck's lack of safety features make it a commuter that will get you to work cramped, grumpy and maybe in one piece.


Suzuki Forenza

MSRP: $14,489

Estimated Weekly Commute Cost: $28.50


Although the Forenza has a spacious interior for its size, reviewers say the seats are cheap and uncomfortable. All that interior space may be taxing on the car's 2.0-liter engine, which reviewers say is underpowered, even for a compact car. Poor safety scores are the final nail in the coffin.

Full List of the Best Commuters:

Car Class Highs Lows MSRP MPG
Honda CR-V Affordable Compact SUVs Comfortable ride, nimble, easy to control No V-6 engine available $20,700 20/27
Subaru Outback Affordable Fullsize Wagons Safe, roomy interior, reliable Disappointing transmission $22,995 20/26
Honda Accord Affordable Midsize Cars Comfortable interior, reliable, strong performance with V-6 Automatic transmission can shift roughly $20,360 22/31
Chevrolet Malibu Affordable Midsize Cars Comfortable seating, sharp exterior Outdated four-speed transmission $19,345 22/30
Hyundai Sonata Affordable Midsize Cars Great safety features, low price Bland performance $17,670 21/31
Subaru Legacy Sedan Affordable Midsize Cars All-wheel drive standard, excellent safety scores Boring exterior styling, a little pricey for the class $20,495 20/27
Honda Civic Affordable Small Cars Quiet ride, low price, good fuel economy Strange instrument panel $15,010 26/34
Hyundai Elantra Affordable Small Cars Fun to drive, great price Some testers found maunal transmission tricky $13,525 24/33
Honda Fit Affordable Small Cars Great gas mileage, practical interior Some think seats are uncomfortable $14,750 27/34
Ford Focus Affordable Small Cars Fun to drive, useful new optional SYNC technology Interior comfort could be better, exterior styling is disliked $14,375 24/35

Save it for the Weekends:

Car Class Highs Lows MSRP MPG
Ford Ranger Compact Pickup Trucks Affordable Cramped cab, lacks modern safety features, underpowered, bumpy ride $14,220 21/26
Chevrolet TrailBlazer Affordable Midsize SUVs Roomy interior, powerful engine Expensive gas guzzler, questionable reliability record $27,405 14/20
Pontiac G5
Affordable Small Cars Sporty exterior, good acceleration Uncomfortable interior, cheap interior construction, bad handling $15,175 24/33
Suzuki Forenza Affordable Small Cars Spacious interior Interior is cheap and uncomfortable, engine is underpowered $14,249 19/28
Hummer H2 Luxury Large SUVs Roomy interior Gas guzzler, expensive $56,690 EPA does not report

Among Hybrids, the Toyota Camry and Chevrolet Malibu Offer the Best Overall Value

 2009 Chevrolet Malibu Hybrid
2009 Chevrolet Malibu Hybrid

Car buyers hoping to economize by switching to a hybrid car will save the most money if they buy a Toyota Camry hybrid, Chevrolet Malibu hybrid or Nissan Altima hybrid, according to a study by NADAguides.com.

As gas prices continue to rise around the country, hybrid cars are attracting more and more drivers who want to save money on fuel. But many consumers looking to buy a more efficient car only compare the EPA fuel economy and don’t factor in the increased price of the hybrid model, according to Tara Baukus Mello, NADAguides.com lead market analyst.

Even though they use less fuel to go down the road, hybrid cars cost more upfront and, depending on how many miles drivers cover, won’t necessarily save money. Baukus Mello and NADAguides.com studied the prices and potential fuel savings of hybrids on sale in the U.S. to determine their break-even point—how far the cars must be driven before savings in fuel costs outweigh the initial outlay for a hybrid.

The study used EPA combined fuel economy ratings for 2008 model year hybrid cars and their gasoline-engine counterparts to evaluate fuel savings. Coupled to the manufacturer suggested retail prices (minus any tax breaks for hybrids) for each vehicle, NADAguides.com found varied results. For gas prices, the study used the current cost of a gallon in Los Angeles, $4.59. While that’s higher than the current national average, it might not be too long before all of us are paying those prices.


 2008 Honda Civic Hybrid
2008 Honda Civic Hybrid

The Toyota Camry, Chevrolet Malibu, Nissan Altima, Toyota Prius and Honda Civic hybrids all offer enough fuel savings for drivers to recoup their price premiums after fewer than 75,000 miles of driving—or less than five years for an average driver. But even among these five models are some surprises.

Hybrids such as the Chevy Tahoe and GMC Yukon take longer to break even than the five cars listed above (about 75,000 miles), and are thus not mentioned in detail below.

The Popular Kids are Costly

Since its introduction to the U.S. in 2000 as a 2001 model, the Toyota Prius has been the volume leader with over half a million models sold stateside. Discussion on fuel economy and high-mileage hybrid cars always seems to center around the quirky Prius, yet it may not be the best hybrid for buyers looking to minimize overall vehicle costs.

Even though it achieves a combined EPA rating of 46 mpg, the Prius starts at $22,160—thousands more than a comparable Toyota Camry LE rated at a combined 25 mpg. Baukus Mello’s study found that a driver paying $4.59 per gallon for gasoline would need to drive 41,626 miles before they saved money. That distance rises to over 47,000 miles for buyers paying the current national average of $4.11 per gallon. For most drivers, that’s three to four years of vehicle ownership before the Prius delivers cost savings.


The Honda Civic hybrid delivers an even worse return on investment. Though the hybrid Civic is far more fuel-efficient than its gasoline brethren, a $4000 premium for the hybrid is hard to recoup—even when factoring in a $525 tax break. At $4.59 a gallon, buyers need to accumulate 57,216 miles in order to save money with a Civic hybrid rather than an automatic LX model.

Still, Baukus Mello said she believes many consumers want to drive hybrid cars regardless of overall cost savings. Though the highly-praised Prius isn’t really going to save money for drivers, it might fulfill a different need: ecological pride.

“You’re doing it because you have an interest in fuel economy,” Baukus Mello said.

Most Popular Mid-Size Cars

 2008 Subaru Legacy

Hybrids and small, fuel-efficient cars are in short supply, and the auto industry, in general, is having one of its worst years ever.

But auto buyers, driven by rapidly rising gas prices, found some appealing fuel-efficient mid-sized and crossover vehicles in the $18,000 to $30,000 range. Sales of some models in this segment surged in June 2008, compared with June 2007, and the increase provided a ray of hope to automakers otherwise struggling to stay afloat.


The biggest winners were the Chevrolet Malibu sedan(25 mpg), sales up 73.4% in June 2008 compared with June 2007; Honda Accord sedan (24 mpg), sales up 54%; Chevrolet Equinox crossover (19 mpg), sales up 45.9; Subaru Forester crossover (22 mpg), sales up 41%; and Pontiac G6 sedan (25 mpg), sales up 34.2%.


The double-digit surge in sales of some mid-size vehicles highlights the shift in consumer preference away from gas-guzzling SUVs and pickups, whose sales continued spiraling downward in June--by 28.4% for the month.

Rough Month All Around

Overall, sales for June fell 18.3%, one of the weakest selling periods in years, according to Autodata Corp., which tracks vehicles sales. There were three fewer selling days in June 2008 (24) compared with June 2007 (27); the percent change calculation is based on numeric comparison and has not been adjusted to reflect the fewer selling days in the period.

Three days made little difference, however, as no automaker was exempt from the sales plunge--even Toyota, which many analysts predicted would overtake General Motors in U.S. sales. GM held its position with an 18% sales drop; Toyota's sales dipped 21%.

No segment was excluded from the sales slump, including hybrids such as the Toyota Prius and Honda Civic. Both experienced a sharp drop in sales last month--not because of a lack of interest, but because of a lack of availability. Auto buyers purchased the vehicles faster than auto makers could build them, so there are fewer of them left to sell. Sales of the Prius (46 mpg) tumbled 25.5% in June 2008 compared with June 2007; Civic hybrid sales (42 mpg) were off 6.1% (gas-powered Civics sales soared, however, by 23.1%).


 2009 Saturn VUE

"The source of weakness is coming from a distressed consumer," says Bob Schnorbus, chief economist at J.D. Power and Associates. "Consumer confidence is as low as one may imagine it getting, and there are uncertainties about where the energy market is going."

Auto sales likely won't rebound "until consumers get their confidence back, and that may not be until next year," he adds. Many consumers are holding off on making purchases until they feel more secure about their jobs, housing and cost of living, auto analysts say.

Mid-Size On The Rise

Consumers who did enter the market in June to purchase a new vehicle bypassed SUVs and searched for other options to reduce fuel expenses. Some snubbed subcompact or small cars for mid-priced vehicles. This broad segment includes a mix of sedans, coupes, convertibles, compact SUVs and crossover vehicles that appeal to families of varying sizes. They want fuel-efficiency but may need a larger vehicle that is versatile enough to meet the demands of their lifestyle.

"Some people really don't want smaller cars," says James Hossack, a consultant for AutoPacific Inc., an automotive marketing and product-consulting company. "What they really want is more fuel-efficient vehicles. They want room for the family and their stuff." Also important is safety, says Hossack.

It may take some time before automakers catch up to the marked shift in consumer preference for fuel-efficient vehicles. If June sales are any indication, demand for these cars is way ahead of supply--and will be for some time to come.

Toyota Prius Killer!

 2010 Honda Hybrid
2010 Honda Hybrid

Our team of spy photographers caught the next-generation Honda hybrid in the scorching deserts of the Southwest performing hot-weather testing. You can immediately tell from the car's profile that Honda's new "green" car is going straight after the Toyota Prius. Although the car is heavily camouflaged, you can see the basic overall design that mimics Toyota's popular hybrid and is heavily influenced by the shape of the company's FCX Clarity fuel-cell concept that appeared at the last Tokyo Motor Show. Back then, the FCX was introduced as a sporty hybrid, but it's obvious from these photos that usable economy is the name of the game now. Some have speculated that this new car will replace the now-discontinued Insight in Honda's lineup, while others maintain that it will become the new Civic Hybrid. Whichever label it wears, one thing for sure is that it will be one of the most fuel-efficient vehicles in the world, and may wrest the crown away from the Prius as the world's favorite green car.


 2010 Honda Hybrid
2010 Honda Hybrid

The price of this new car will be low, as Honda maintains it will be an entry-level car with 200,000 units selling annually — half of those to be sold in the United States. Early rumors indicate that it may be as low as $19,000. With seating for five, this 4-door, front-wheel-drive hatchback will be using an updated motor-assist hybrid system and an advanced nickel/metal-hydride system, not lithium-ion batteries. We're not sure yet on the gasoline part of the equation; it could be the company's lean-burning 1.3-liter inline-4 (in the current Civic Hybrid) or something even leaner. The expectation is class-leading fuel economy, no doubt way north of 40 mpg. Look for the new Honda Hybrid to arrive at dealerships here in the States in late 2009.

Is there anything the Mitsubishi Lancer can't do?

Wednesday, July 16, 2008

Mitsubishi Lancer Dakar competitor.

Mitsubishi announced today that it will enter a modified Lancer in next year's Dakar rally, the legendary grueling race through Africa. The base model Lancer is a small economy car with not much pep but a good cabin tech package, seemingly a poor platform for this tough race. However, Mitsubishi has been proving for years with the Lancer Evo, a heavily modified version of the car, that it can win World Rally Car races. The newest version, the Evo X, impressed the heck out of us on the track at Laguna Seca in Monterey, Calif., earlier this year. Mitsubishi only released a sketch and some specifications of the car, designated MRX09, it intends to enter in Dakar.

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback

The Lancer Sportback will be launched at the Paris auto show.

(Credit: Mitsubishi)
The body design is based on the Lancer Sportback Mitsubishi will show off at the Paris auto show this fall. The MRX09 is powered by a turbocharged three-liter six-cylinder diesel engine producing over 260 horsepower and 480 foot-pounds of torque. The car's all-wheel-drive system uses a center limited slip differential, similar to that on the Lancer Evo, and a five speed sequential manual gearbox. Mitsubishi achieved 12 wins in past Dakar rallies using its Montero/Pajero SUV as a platform, so the Lancer represents a significant departure from tradition. The only question that remains is whether the Dakar rally will actually happen, as the 2008 race was canceled because of the threat posed by armed groups along the route

2008 Infiniti M45X

When you think big, comfortable sedans with cutting-edge tech, you look for a price range around $80,000 to $100,000 and think models such as the Mercedes-Benz S-Class, BMW 7-series, and Lexus LS. But then here comes the 2008 Infiniti M45x with all the tech those other cars offer for a measly $60,000, fully loaded. This is the car for well-heeled value shoppers.

The M45x model is Infiniti's top-of-the-line sedan, featuring the model's largest motor along with all-wheel drive. This big sedan cruises easily and coddled us in its very comfortable front seats. Infiniti has been a real leader in cabin technology lately, and our M45x test car came with not only the optional Technology package, but also the Advanced Technology package. There are only a couple of places where we felt this car let us down, in its uninspiring automatic transmission and its mediocre fuel economy, which was expected given the size of the engine.

Test the tech: Traffic cruise
The 2008 Infiniti M45x includes a couple of cutting-edge technologies as options: XM NavTraffic and adaptive cruise control. We tested both of these with a rush-hour trip into heavy traffic around San Francisco, a city consistently rated in the top five for worst traffic in the country. We've used adaptive cruise control, a radar-based system that slows the car down to the speed of slower-moving traffic ahead, on freeways with sparse traffic. Even there we kept a foot hovering over the brake pedal, at least initially, afraid to put our trust into the system. But we were ready to take the next step and drive in heavy traffic, sans feet.


The adaptive cruise control is set for 72 mph, according to the display on the tachometer, but slower traffic ahead has the car's actual speed at just below 60 mph

And we also used the opportunity to test the traffic avoidance feature of the navigation system. With the Infiniti, as in a few other cars we've seen, such as the Cadillac CTS, the navigation system uses the information it gets about traffic on the road ahead to come up with alternative routes. This level of integration beats the systems that merely show traffic information without warning about traffic jams on the road ahead.

We set our initial route for the San Francisco International Airport, a few miles south of the city, and followed the route onto the freeway. Traffic was stopped in the other direction, but we got enough clear space southbound to gun the car up to 70 mph and set the cruise control. As we came up on the traffic ahead, our hearts pounding, the car braked and slowed itself to 45 mph, matching the speed of the car in front of us. The distance between our car and the next was initially pretty far, and would tempt too many people to cut in, so we pushed a button on the steering wheel that brought the following distance to the lowest setting.

In a few stretches just south of the city, the navigation screen showed an amber line along the freeway, indicating traffic moving at 20 mph to 40 mph, but the navigation system didn't suggest an alternative. We figured it would only suggest a different route for traffic going below 20 mph, indicated on the map by a red line.


This dense traffic is moving slower than the 20 mph to 40 mph indicated on the navigation screen.

As we drove under the cruise control's speed management, we felt that the car we were tracking was going a bit too slow, about 5 mph under the limit, so we looked for a clear spot and jumped a lane to the left. Our car immediately sped up, trying to reach the 70 mph it was set for, but quickly locked onto the car ahead, and we settled in at a more comfortable pace. But following this car, a minivan cut into the space between us. There wasn't a lot of room, and the M45x started slowing down. But we just didn't feel it was enough, so we hit the brakes harder to avoid a collision. We concluded that the adaptive cruise control does work in even heavy traffic, as long as it's moving along, but you have to be ready to get a foot on the brake when needed.

For the trip back, we set our destination as CNET headquarters, and the navigation system advised us that it adjusted our route based on traffic ahead. We looked at the entire route and saw that it wanted us to exit the freeway before a red section in downtown San Francisco. So far, so good. We got on the route, but quickly got into very slow moving traffic running well under 20 mph. Looking at the map, it claimed we were only in an amber section, and should be moving faster. This is a problem with the reporting and not Infiniti's system. If the traffic conditions were up-to-date, the navigation system would have routed us off the road. As it was, we took the next exit off and devised our own detour.

In the cabin
Our 2008 Infiniti M45x featured most of the same cabin tech we saw in the Infiniti EX35, and it is all very good. An LCD sits in the center of the dashboard with a set of controls on a panel below it. The main controller is a big, multifunction knob with directional buttons inset on top of it. We like this setup a bit better than the joystick/knobs found in BMW's iDrive and Mercedes-Benz's COMAND interfaces. Infiniti also supplements the buttons and knob with a touch-screen LCD, but in the M45x, the screen is too far from the driver for that aspect to be useful. There is also a voice-command system that replicates most of the controller commands.


The multifunction knob on the control panel is supplemented by the touch screen.

The navigation system included in the M45x's Technology package stores its map data on a hard drive. That and its quick processor make for fast route calculation and map rendering. The hard drive also allows for some very detailed information storage, such as outlines of some buildings in major urban areas and 3D map views. For destination entry, the multifunction knob makes it easy to select letters and numbers from the onscreen keyboard. The system also offers a complete points-of-interest database.

We were also happy with the route guidance, which uses detailed graphics to show upcoming turns and text-to-speech, reading out the names of streets. We mentioned the live traffic reporting above. Along with traffic flow information, the system shows incidents, such as road construction or accidents. There are too major traffic systems in cars right now, XM NavTraffic and Clear Channel's Total Traffic Network. In the San Francisco Bay area, we've noticed slightly better coverage from the Clear Channel service, but NavTraffic seems to be catching up. It showed traffic information on a highway through the center of the city, something we hadn't seen previously from this service, although it didn't have a highway south of the city that is covered by Clear Channel.

For entertainment, the M45x offers an almost ridiculous number of audio sources. Along with terrestrial radio, it has XM satellite radio. There is a single CD slot on the center stack, which can play MP3 CDs, and a DVD player in the console. You can play MP3 files off of a compact flash card inserted in a slot on the center stack or listen to an iPod plugged into a port in the center console. The iPod interface is excellent, letting you select music by artist, album, and genre. With the DVD player, you can even watch movies on the LCD, although we're not sure why anyone would do that.


These shoulder speakers come with the Advanced Technology package, part of an upgraded Bose audio system.

And the audio system produces excellent sound. With the Technology package, you only get eight Bose speakers, but the Advanced Technology package upgrades the audio system to 14 speakers, complete with subwoofer, center fill, and four shoulder speakers mounted in the front seats. 308 watts of amplification power these speakers, and the audio is refined using Bose's digital 5.1 surround sound. This system results in very clear instrument reproduction throughout the spectrum. The bass isn't overwhelming, but it is nice and clear, while highs are very distinct. With the audio system and the comfortable seats, we just wanted to drive around all day.

On the communication front, Infiniti's Bluetooth phone system is generally good, although it requires you to push your phonebook into the car. Some systems, notably from BMW, upload your cell phone's entire phonebook automatically. Our phone only let us push one entry at a time into the Infiniti's system, but other phones will let you push the entire phone book. For manual dialing, there is a good onscreen keypad, or you can use the voice command system.


The Lane Departure Prevention feature is activated with a button on the lower right of the steering wheel.

Many cars stop at these three basics: navigation, digital audio, and Bluetooth, but the M45x keeps a few more tricks in the cabin. We mentioned the adaptive cruise control above. Other driving technologies include Lane Departure Warning, which sounds a tone if you cross a lane line without signaling, and Lane Departure Prevention, a new technology from Infiniti we first saw in the EX35. When you enable this system by pushing a button on the steering wheel, it slightly brakes the offside wheels if you continue to drift over a lane line after the Lane Departure Warning has sounded. This braking results in the car being nudged back into its lane. The system only works above 45 mph and it is easy to override, either by turning the wheel or using a turn signal. In practice, we found this system worked very well when we let the car drift over a lane line.

The last significant piece of cabin tech is the rear-view camera. Previously, we've been so impressed by the rear-view cameras in Audis that we've tested them with backward slaloms and other maneuvering. The reverse camera in the M45x uses the same technology, presenting an overlay that shows the car's proximity to objects behind it, and another that curves when the wheels are turned, showing the path the car will take.

Under the hood
The 2008 Infiniti M45x is the first time the M45 has been fitted with Infiniti's all-wheel-drive system. This system, also used in the FX models, can move torque from 100 percent rear-wheel-drive to a 50-50 split between the front and rear wheels. Infiniti claims the system not only helps during inclement weather--there is a snow setting to lessen torque as well--but also gives the car better sport handling.


The snow button reduces torque, making it less likely the tires will spin on slippery surfaces

We had very dry conditions during our review period, but did drive some winding mountain roads, putting on the power through the curves. During hard maneuvering, the car leaned a bit and the rear tires felt like they skittered over the pavement, but the car never really slipped. It felt like it had grip to spare, but because of the car's heavy feel, we never really could tell when torque was splitting to the front wheels.

The five-speed automatic transmission didn't seem to add much to the driving experience. It had the usual manual shift mode requiring a push up on the shifter to upshift, and down for a downshift. But gear shifts felt slushy--typical automatic behavior--not like some of more highly tuned automatics found in cars such as the Cadillac CTS or the new Mercedes-Benz AMGs.


The five-speed automatic felt like a typical automatic transmission, with no real sport turning.

With 325 horsepower and 336 pound-feet of torque, the 4.5-liter V-8 under the hood isn't the most powerful engine around. Instead, it seems as if Infiniti is trying to strike a balance between power and economy. The engine does give the car decent acceleration, but it's not overwhelming. It seems more that Infiniti realized people buying a big luxury sedan weren't going to push it hard through the twisties, so it tuned the engine for comfortable freeway cruising, making sure there would be power when you needed it.

The engine uses continuous valve timing technology to maximize efficiency, but even so, the car is subject to a hefty gas-guzzler tax. The EPA gives it 14 mpg city and 20 mpg highway. We averaged a bit more than 16 mpg, right in the middle of that range, not great, but about what we would expect from an engine this size. We've seen comparable fuel economy in six-cylinder cars. For emissions, the M45x gets California's minimal LEV II rating.

In sum
At a base price of $52,750, the 2008 Infiniti M45x comes in fairly cheap compared with a lot of the competition. Our car also came with the $3,350 Technology package and the $2,800 Advanced Technology package. Along with the $1,300 gas guzzler tax and the $765 destination charge, the total comes up to $60,965, still a good deal for a car with this kind of tech.

For our rating, we give the M45x top marks for its cabin tech. With the core technologies we look at, the M45x offers many advanced features. It adds a number of other technologies on top of that, including Lane Departure Prevention, something no other manufacturer has currently. In the performance tech category, we are less impressed. Fuel economy is far from wonderful, and it doesn't offer a particularly sporty drive as compensation.

2009 Hyundai Sonata Limited V6

Hyundai got high marks from many auto reviewers for the last generation of its Sonata sedan, but it fell short on the car tech front. But now the 2009 Hyundai Sonata is here, and it looks good for catching up with and surpassing its nearest competitors. We weren't surprised to find a navigation system in a Toyota Corolla we reviewed recently, but when we saw the LCD in the Sonata's dashboard, we only kept our feet because we had a little advance warning. It was the iPod integration and the voice command system that really floored us. We had the top-of-the line Limited V6 model, which comes with an engine offering more than adequate power for the little sedan. We were only troubled by the transmission's gear hunting, the soft ride, and the overly powered steering.

Test the tech: Talking to a car
Voice command systems can be troublesome. Many times while testing cars we've found ourselves yelling at the dashboard, repeating the same phrase over and over again, only to have the car reply "Sorry?" or "Audio off" when we were trying to cancel route guidance, as one example. And thinking it was audacious of the 2009 Hyundai Sonata, as a newcomer to modern car tech, to offer a voice command system, we put it to the test.


The Sonata has onscreen help for its voice commands.

While driving down the freeway, we started with a few free-form commands, not bothering to read the manual. After hitting the voice button on the left side of the steering wheel, we waited for the prompt, then said, "Destination." The navigation system brought up the destination entry screen right away--a good start. We wanted to go back to the map, so tried saying, "Exit." Hearing that, it switched from the CD player to AM radio. All right, time to get serious.

We pulled off the freeway, parked, and said "Help." The car brought up some top-level help commands on the screen, informing us that we could get specific help on any function. After reading the available commands, we set off again, and tried something complex. We said, "FM frequency 102 point 1," and the car responded by switching to FM 102.1, the local classical station.

OK, we had the hang of this. Thinking we might want to stop for a water, we tried another somewhat complex command. First we said, "Destination," then, "Find nearest convenience store." The screen immediately brought up a list of 7-Elevens and other convenience stores, sorted by their distance from our current location. Nice, but there were no indicator arrows telling us the direction to each one. With a few taps of the touch screen, we could find the locations of any entry on the map, but that was fairly tedious, especially when most of the nearest ones were behind us and we weren't in the mood to backtrack.


We liked its response when we asked it to "find nearest Mexican restaurants."

We continued on, and in thinking about our experience with the system so far, we realized that we might be able to utter our commands out of context. For example, with many systems we've found that you have to drill down, as in first saying "Navigation" then saying navigation-specific commands. So with the Sonata, we brought up the iPod screen, then said, "Find nearest Mexican restaurant." The system switched from our music screen to a list of nearby Mexican restaurants.

We were pleased with the Sonata's voice command system. In general, the voice commands are intuitive. It doesn't take much time with the onscreen help to figure out some useful commands. It also recognized our spoken commands with good accuracy, working just as well as the system we've used extensively in the Honda Civic.

In the cabin
We mentioned above that we were surprised to find so many tech features in the 2009 Hyundai Sonata. Part of the reason for all these tech features was apparent in the cabin where Infinity logos abound. The subwoofer grille on the rear deck proclaimed Infinity, as did the faceplate for the navigation and audio system. We could see that Hyundai had been hanging out in the right company.


Hyundai keeps knobs to a minimum with this instrument panel.

The instrument panel in the Sonata is very uncluttered, with a high-resolution LCD and plenty of nicely inset buttons. Hyundai seems to be taking a stance against knobs, for the most part, as even the temperature controls are rocker switches. In fact, there is so much leftover space from this clean design that Hyundai places two small storage areas in the center stack, below the navigation unit.

The optional navigation system, a good deal at $1,250, uses bright, clear maps with good resolution, avoiding jaggy street names. It renders its maps quickly enough, although we sometimes found its route recalculation slow. On one trip, when we forced it to recalculate multiple times, it finally seemed to give up. Of course, our final destination was already visible on the map, so the navigation system must have been telling us we could find our own way from there. But other than that critique, the route guidance is good, with clear graphics for upcoming turns and text-to-speech, its one advanced feature, where it reads out street names.

We found destination entry easy and intuitive, whether inputting an address or searching for a point of interest. The system also allows for complex routes, letting you input multiple waypoints. There is a screen listing all waypoints on the route that lets you add or delete addresses.

With the navigation system branded as an Infinity, it's no surprise that the audio system comes from Infinity, too. That both systems come from the same OEM means good integration between them. A USB and an auxiliary audio port in the console are part of this system and are standard with the Sonata Limited. You can plug a USB flash drive directly into the USB port and play MP3s from that, and you can plug an MP3 player into the auxiliary input. But there is a third option. Hyundai includes a cable that plugs into both the USB port and the auxiliary port at the same time, and terminates in an iPod connector.


The connector for iPod, USB drive, and auxiliary input sits in the console, marked by blue backlit labels.

We frankly didn't expect to find iPod integration when we put the Sonata on our schedule. The interface for it, through the touch-screen LCD, is everything we would want, letting us choose music by album, artist, and genre. The interface for USB drives is more primitive, merely letting you browse through folders, similar to the interface for MP3 CDs. With the navigation system, there is a single-CD slot. A six-CD changer is available if you don't get the navigation system. We've found that in cars with iPod integration, the iPod becomes our go-to source for music, and we don't bother much with CDs. XM Satellite Radio is also built into this system with, we expect, the first three months free.

The audio system in the Sonata uses six speakers in the standard configuration of tweeters in the A pillars and woofers in each door, along with a subwoofer in the rear deck. Our experience with this system largely depended on the music we were listening to. With acoustic guitar, we could hear the scratch of the strings, pointing to good clarity at the high end. But tracks with serious bass quickly overwhelmed the speakers, leading to bad rattle. It sounds like the amp used with this system is clear and powerful, but the speakers aren't always up to its output.

We were disappointed that the Sonata doesn't have Bluetooth cell phone integration as an option, especially as a hands-free law is about to come into effect in California. Looks like we will have to wait until 2010, when both Kia and Hyundai models will be getting a Microsoft system similar to the Ford Sync.

Under the hood
The 2009 Hyundai Sonata comes in three trims: GLS, SE, and Limited. A 3.3-liter V-6 is available in all trims, while a 2.4-liter four cylinder is available in the GLS and Limited trims. We had the 3.3-liter V-6 in our Limited trim model, which puts out 249 horsepower and 229 pound-feet of torque--plenty of power for the little Sonata. The engine hummed right along, moving the car easily up hills, at freeway speeds, and passing other cars. To enhance efficiency, the engine uses continuous variable valve timing.


The V-6 engine is powerful in the Sonata, but we would have liked to test the economy of the available four cylinder.

The 3.3 liters seems an odd choice for displacement, and Hyundai could probably have shaved it down to 3 liters without hurting the driving experience while increasing mileage. As it is, this engine gets an EPA-rated 19 mpg city and 29 mpg highway. During our time with the car, we saw the mileage creep up close to 23 mpg during freeway driving, but our final average was down at 19.4 mpg. An emissions rating wasn't available at the time of this review, but we are impressed that the 2.4-liter four-cylinder engine available in the Sonata is a PZEV, meaning it produces very few smog-causing pollutants.

The five-speed automatic transmission proved to be the weak link in this power train. It doesn't react particularly fast, even in manual mode, and it takes a while to find the right gear when stressed with hill climbs or passing. Our passing experience inspired very little confidence. When we stomped the accelerator to get around slower cars on a hill, the transmission did its hunting, and settled on a gear, which made the engine give off a bad grinding sound.


We felt this five-speed transmission spent too long hunting for gears when passing or hill climbing.

The suspension in the Sonata is also very soft. You can feel the shock absorbers compress easily, and on one bad section of road, we felt the suspension bottom out on itself. This type of suspension is fine on a commute car, but allows for plenty of lean in corners and generally doesn't behave well in more stressful situations.

Likewise, the steering felt overpowered. It was too easy to swing the wheel around, whether maneuvering through a parking lot or barreling down the freeway. We didn't get a lot of road feel through the steering wheel because of the power mechanism, although it was tight enough to produce results when turned. Again, this tuning is fine in a commute car, but can be troublesome in situations where you want some feedback.

The Sonata comes standard with traction and electronic stability control, along with a tire-pressure monitoring system, plus airbags all the way around.

In sum
The 2009 Hyundai Sonata Limited V6 goes for a base price of $25,670. The navigation package is a surprisingly good deal at $1,250. Along with $90 carpeted floor mats and a $675 destination charge, our Sonata came in at $27,685. The Limited is the only trim with the navigation option, although you can save some dollars by going to the four-cylinder version, which bases at $23,970.

We were suitably impressed with the Sonata Limited, as it offered cabin tech we weren't expecting. The navigation system offers one advanced feature, text-to-speech, and generally looks and works well. We noted some problems with the audio system, but we also liked the iPod integration. Lack of Bluetooth is a problem. The drivetrain tech was less impressive. The engine was fine, although it could have been more economical, but we just didn't like the transmission. Among the Sonata's major competitors, the Honda Accord is too pricey by comparison. We've also tested the Nissan Altima Coupe, a tech-filled and more sporty alternative, and the Toyota Camry Hybrid, which offers better fuel economy

2009 Nissan GT-R

It must be Christmas, because a 2009 Nissan GT-R showed up in our garage. Just like how we spent 1973 transfixed by commercials for the Vertibird Rescue Ship toy, we slathered over every specification sheet and photo of the new GT-R since the concept was shown at the 2005 Tokyo Auto Show. And in each case, we finally ended up at the controls of one. The GT-R is definitely the biggest, baddest toy on the block.

The GT-R is essentially a race car made for the street. Production cars don't generally squeeze 480 horsepower out of a V-6, or have the transmission mounted at the rear axle. And the incredibly rigid suspension feels as if it was made for a race car. The car looks impressive and brutish, a theme that carries into the cabin and the driving feel. The Corvette Z06 has some scary competition in the GT-R.

Surprisingly, the GT-R is in no way stripped down, except maybe for the lack of an iPod port. Nissan put all of its excellent cabin electronics in the dashboard, which includes a hard-drive-based navigation system, an impressive stereo with plenty of digital music capability, and even Bluetooth cell phone integration. And those electronics share space with an incredibly detailed performance computer. This Nissan GT-R just doesn't compromise in its car tech.

Test the tech: GT-R versus virtual GT-R
We couldn't wait to drive the real 2009 Nissan GT-R, so months ago we picked up Gran Turismo 5 Prologue, which has a virtual GT-R. We compared the driving experience in each by taking the real GT-R for a drive on back roads north of San Francisco, and the virtual car in the game's Suzuka East track. In the game, we set the physics to Professional, as we figured that should replicate as closely as possible real-world physics.


There's room for a V-8 under the hood, but this twin-turbo V-6 gets the job done.

The first real difference we noticed was with the engine sound. The real GT-R makes an engine sound dominated by its turbos. The 3.8-liter V-6 isn't particularly loud or throaty, but when you give it power, the twin turbochargers whirr up like turbines. In the game, the engine sounds more generic, just a standard engine growl. Other things that just can't be replicated in the game is the hard ride, because of the low-profile tires wrapped around the 20-inch wheels and the rigid suspension, and the general cabin noise and vibration. The GT-R isn't a comfortable ride unless it's on a well-paved surface.

Acceleration between the real and virtual GT-R seems well-replicated. In the game, 60 mph seems slow, and it's difficult to get below that speed. With the real GT-R, we tapped the gas while getting on the freeway, and by the time we glanced at the speedometer, we were already at 60 mph. The GT-R has been clocked to 60 mph at times approaching 3 seconds. The kind of acceleration is really incredible. The big difference here is that it is much easier to modulate the GT-R's gas pedal than a PlayStation 3 controller, making it much easier to control the speed in the real car.


One hundred miles an hour and 6,500rpm in third gear are about right for the virtual and real GT-R.

The speedometer in the real car is much easier to glance at than that of the virtual car, and it helps that you can get a digital speed display on the tachometer and on the performance computer. While driving on public roads, our speedometer needle was generally in the 6 o'clock position, at 40 mph to 60 mph, while 200 mph is up in the 12 o'clock position. You also get a much different sense of speed--we could tell when we were getting up to scary while driving the GT-R down a two-lane blacktop with blind corners and rises.

The handling in the real GT-R truly feels phenomenal, as good as that of the Audi R8 we reviewed a few months ago. To get the real GT-R out of sorts, it takes the kind of driving you can only do in a controlled environment. We threw it into one particularly good corner with some speed, and felt the grip loosen for a fraction of a second, then get taken up by the all-wheel drive. In the game, we spent a lot of time facing backward in the sand as the car wiped out on the sharper turns. Maybe it was the difficulty in controlling our speed in the game, but we had a much harder time maintaining grip. It didn't seem to map well to our experience with the real thing.


There's nothing like open road for testing out the real Nissan GT-R.

As for the transmission, the game's automatic setting is far different than the real car's automatic setting. The GT-R uses a six-speed double-clutch manual transmission. There is no clutch pedal, as the dual clutches are controlled by computer. You can set it for automatic shifting or manual, using the column-mounted paddle shifters. In the game, the car shifts like a sports car, maintaining revs so you can keep power. The real car's automatic mode is designed for economy, rapidly shifting up to sixth gear even when you are only going 25 mph.

In manual mode, the real GT-R's shifts are visceral and solid. You can feel each one through the car as you push the left paddle for down or the right paddle for up. The game does a good job of replicating the match-up between speed, tach, and gear, but you just don't get that same abrupt power change in the virtual experience.


Recovering from yet another spin in the virtual GT-R, we miss the visceral feeling of the real thing.

Although we've spent many hours enjoying the virtual race track, nothing beats the experience of sitting behind the wheel of a real GT-R. For a good look at the Nissan GT-R's performance in a controlled setting, WebRidesTV has video of a GranTurismo 5 Prologue-inspired match-up between the GT-R and a Ford GT.

In the cabin
The cabin of the 2009 Nissan GT-R brings in many race car touches, but adapted for a road car. The deep front seats embrace you, but you don't have to mess around with a four-point harness. Although the steering wheel has a bubble in the middle for the airbag, the surrounding area, leading out to the three spokes, is metal and flat. Industrial-looking controls mounted on this flat area don't set torque and traction control, such as on a Formula One car, but handle more mundane features, like the cruise control and audio.


A high-resolution split screen map, with 3D and plan views, is an unexpected luxury of the GT-R.

We recently saw this same package of cabin gadgets in the Infiniti M45x, including navigation with traffic reporting, Bluetooth hands-free cell phone integration, and a stereo system that handles many digital audio sources. The interface between the two cars is different--where the Infiniti has a big multifunction control knob, the GT-R relies on a row of buttons and the touch-screen LCD, which works perfectly well. The GT-R also has the same voice command system as the M45x.

For a detailed look at the navigation and traffic system, take a look at our M45x review. Here we will just point out that, as the system stores its maps on a hard drive, route calculation is fast and the maps refresh quickly. You can look at 3D or plan view maps, or put them both in a split screen. When you have a route programmed, the system will automatically detour around bad traffic. Route guidance is aided by text-to-speech, which reads out the names of streets.


When you rip a CD to the car's hard drive, it automatically tags the songs from its internal Gracenote database.

The audio system is similar, but a little short of, that in the M45x. You can rip music to the GT-R's hard drive, which offers 9.3GB of space for music, or play MP3s from a CompactFlash card inserted in a slot in front of the shifter. There is an auxiliary input, suitable for an MP3 player, but no iPod port. The single CD slot plays MP3 CDs, and there is XM satellite radio.

Sound quality is very good from the 11 Bose speakers around the cabin, although they have a lot of road noise to conquer. The system has a centerfill in the dashboard, two subwoofers, tweeters in the A-pillars, mids in the doors, and most obviously, two woofers between the back seats. This system didn't flinch at heavy bass and reproduced highs nicely, although the sound was slightly compressed, unlike the better separation from the audio system in the M45x.

The hands-free cell phone system is useful, in the sense that you just don't want to take your hands from the wheel. Of course, you might not want to answer the phone at all as you go speeding down country roads. The system can store phone book entries, which is nice, although we had to push them from our phone into the car one at a time.

One feature that would have been nice, especially with the sharply angled rear window, is a rear view camera. This is one car you definitely don't want to back into a pole.


This screen was our favorite on the performance computer, as we like seeing the torque split change in different driving situations.

As a feature unique to the GT-R, the car includes a fascinating and customizable performance computer. We covered this feature and some other aspects on the cabin in our Nissan GT-R cabin tech gallery at the last Los Angeles auto show. Polyphony Digital, the same company that developed Gran Turismo 5 Prologue, helped Nissan with the performance computer design.

You can access the performance computer by pushing the Function button to the left of the LCD. A knob lets you scroll through the four customizable screens, marked 1 through 4, or the set screens, marked A through G. These screens use a variety of graphs and virtual gauges for wheel turn, torque split, gas and brake pedal percentage, turbo boost, and many other performance parameters. There is also a stopwatch for timed runs.

Under the hood
For such a muscular looking car, it's surprising to only find six cylinders under the hood. But Nissan wrings 480 horsepower at 6,400rpm out of this 3.8-liter V-6 with dual turbochargers. It produces 430 foot-pounds of torque between 3,200rpm and 5,200rpm. Our experience being pressed into the back seat with even 50 percent gas pedal bears these figures out in a qualitative sense.

The architecture of the car is unique, with the engine and transmission at opposite ends to balance the car out. The six-speed dual-clutch manual transmission has a shifter that merely puts it in park, reverse, neutral, manual, and automatic. In manual mode, you can shift up or down with the shifter, but you have to resort to the paddle shifters. In this car, we have no problem with this arrangement.


The downshift paddle is on the left side. You can get the car into manual mode by tapping a paddle or pushing the shifter to the right.

The automatic mode shifts early, getting up to sixth gear at only 25 mph. But with this much horsepower, the engine isn't bothered as it idles along at 1,500rpm, keeping the car moving easily. During one stretch of road, we had the transmission in fifth when we decided to pass a car in front of us. We went from 45 mph to 85 mph without changing gear, although a drop down to fourth gear or third gear would have blasted us by even faster.

We found city driving frustrating, as we could feel how much power we had on tap that couldn't be used. In these low-speed traffic situations, the automatic shifting felt rough, adding to the uncomfortable feeling of the suspension. There is a comfort mode for the suspension, but it doesn't smooth things over that much. We felt the driving experience in traffic was better than in the Audi R8, which suffered a lot from its R-Tronic transmission, but it didn't come close to the BMW M3, which drives easily in stop-and-go traffic or on the track.

The car's very stiff suspension absorbs road imperfections nicely, keeping the car stuck to the pavement, but it doesn't coddle the driver at all. In corners, there is no lean and the steering is very responsive. All-wheel drive, which defaults 100 percent torque to the rear wheels but can shift a full 50 percent to the front, helps keep the car gripping in the corners and under acceleration. This all-wheel-drive system, along with traction control and suspension, uses computer-aided adjustment to keep it at optimum settings no matter the driving conditions.


These switches control torque, suspension, and traction. The red lights indicate R, or track, mode.

Nissan advertises the GT-R as the supercar that anyone can drive, as it is hard to get it out of control. But in hard cornering we felt a small but satisfying amount of slip that got taken up by the car's systems. There are three switches on the instrument panel that let you adjust various settings for torque, suspension, and traction control. Each can be pushed up to R mode, with accompanying red lights. We drove some stretches of highway with the settings in R mode, but didn't notice a huge difference. The track is where these will matter. The torque switch can also be set for snow, the suspension for comfort, and the traction control to off.

As of this review, fuel economy numbers for the 2009 Nissan GT-R haven't been published. But don't expect them to be good, considering the amount of horsepower the engine produces. During our time with the car, we got about 14 mpg. On the plus side, and something we find impressive given the GT-R's supercar status, is that it is expected to meet California's Ultra Low Emissions Vehicle standard, one better than the minimal LEV requirement.

In sum
The 2009 Nissan GT-R goes for a base price of $69,850 or $71,900 for the premium model, which we had. We don't expect there to be options with this car, although there will be the usual destination charge. Few cars will get you to 60 mph in less than 4 seconds for this kind of money, and none offer the innovative driving tech of the GT-R at this price.

For our Car Tech rating, we give the GT-R near top marks all-around. It's a beautiful exterior design, although there are some odd creases when you get close, such as the joint between the B-pillar and the roof. The cabin tech benefits greatly from Nissan's already excellent hard-drive-based navigation system, stereo and Bluetooth. We can ignore the lack of an iPod adapter, in favor of the brilliant and unique in-dash performance computer. As for the under-the-hood mechanics, it is all very brilliant, only falling down in fuel economy.

2009 Acura TSX


Because of its solid and comfortable everyday driver demeanor, buyers of the new 2009 Acura TSX will probably opt for the five-speed automatic transmission, for ease of driving in traffic and urban settings. And that's unfortunate, because to appreciate Honda's capability to build truly efficient engines that deliver both economy and power, you just need to get the six-speed manual transmission.

Our TSX came with the manual transmission, and it made driving the car a joyful experience. Of course, the many cabin electronics didn't hurt either, if we discount the mass of buttons on instrument panel and steering wheel. Acura evolves its excellent navigation system further by adding weather reports and better integration with live traffic. We also had a pleasant surprise in audio sources, finding the TSX not only adds a USB port, but Bluetooth streaming as well.

Test the tech: Sun chaser
When we sent editor Kevin Massy to San Diego for a preview of the 2009 Acura TSX last February, he got caught in a snow storm during his test drive, which is ironic as one new feature in the car is live weather reports. The weather-reporting feature shows weather icons on the navigation map, including severe weather alerts, and it lets you look up current and three-day forecasts for most cities. For our tech test, foggy San Francisco weather convinced us to seek a sunnier clime.


The report shows clear skies and sunny weather in Santa Cruz, Calif.

We hit the Info button on the instrument panel and chose the Weather feature. Santa Cruz, Calif., a town south of San Francisco, seemed like a likely candidate for sun, so we entered the city name and looked up the current weather. It said clear skies, so we chose a Santa Cruz point of interest from the car's navigation system and had it show us the route. Freeways took us most of the way, which meant 70 mph to 80 mph in sixth gear. We were impressed that, even at these speeds and in top gear, the car's 2.4-liter four-cylinder engine still delivered some acceleration when we hit the gas.

It took us about an hour to get to Santa Cruz, which was a thoroughly pleasant drive in the TSX, but the sun was clouded over when we got there. We quickly looked up the weather report in the car, and sure enough, it said partly cloudy. Well, the weather reporting in the car was accurate, as far as we could tell. We just didn't count on the weather changing.


When we got to Santa Cruz, we found that the weather changed.

Ever diligent, we made another attempt, locating the town of Half Moon Bay, Calif., up the coast where our weather feature said skies were clear and people were happy. Well, we just assumed that latter part. Heading up Highway 1 toward our promised sun, we got to play with the gears some more, because of occasionally slower traffic. The TSX passed other cars with ease, especially when we dropped the gear down to third, its 201 horsepower accelerating the car quickly when we asked for it.


Here's what partly cloudy skies look like.

But in Half Moon Bay we saw the same gray skies we had seen in Santa Cruz. And checking the car again, the weather report showed partly cloudy. We couldn't fault the car, as its weather reports seemed accurate for the time they were delivered. We could only assume a partly cloudy sky hung perpetually over our heads.

In the cabin
The interior of the 2009 Acura TSX proves a reasonable antidote to crummy weather by offering a lot of toys, both entertaining and informational. And Acura provides no shortage of buttons to access them with. Acura doesn't really do options, so you can get the car either with technology or without, the difference being about $3,000. If you don't spend the extra money, you still get a Bluetooth hands-free system, also found in the tech version of the car.


This mass of buttons on the instrument panel is complemented by even more buttons on the steering wheel.

Unfortunately, when you move up to the techie car, complete with navigation and a premium stereo, this Bluetooth system isn't integrated well with the rest of the tech. Our ongoing complaint about the tech interface in Acuras is that you get one set of buttons for Bluetooth voice command, and another set of buttons for navigation and stereo voice command. And Acura still uses its big multifunction knob surrounded by a sea of buttons. Although we've reviewed many Acura models, we still had to look for the particular button we wanted.

Another thing Acura has yet to improve is the resolution of its navigation maps. They just don't look that good, especially when compared with a newer system we saw in the Hyundai Sonata. But the navigation system overall is quite good. It is still DVD-based, but we found map refresh and route calculation to be quick. And one thing we've always liked about Acura's navigation system is the complete points-of-interest database, listing every retail shopping location.


You can view a list of traffic incidents on the navigation screen.

Acura has offered XM NavTraffic in various models for a while now, but it takes the integration a step further by having the system intelligently route around bad traffic congestion if you've set a destination. Like other cars we've seen with this feature, it will only route around traffic moving below 20 mph, but it lets you drive into moderately slow traffic. The weather reports we discussed above are also delivered through XM satellite radio.

We were happy to see the ELS brand on the TSX's stereo, an indication that Grammy Winner Elliot Scheiner's company designed the audio system. ELS Surround is a Panasonic brand, the company that supplies the hardware for this audio system. We like how this audio system lets you adjust not only treble and bass, but also centerfill and subwoofer levels. The results in the TSX were very good, but it sounded as if there was a little less separation than we heard in the Acura RDX, the first model to use the ELS system. The ELS system in the TSX uses 10 speakers, including a subwoofer and centerfill, powered by 415 watts of amplification.


The USB connecter, which also serves as an iPod port, is new for the 2009 model.

Audio sources include a six-disc in-dash changer that reads MP3 CDs and DVD audio, XM satellite radio, an auxiliary input, a USB port that also offers iPod integration, and Bluetooth streaming audio support. Many cars go down to a single disc player when navigation is present, but not the TSX. And we were also impressed that audio streamed from the same phone we had paired as part of the standard hands-free cell phone integration. Even Ford's Sync system hasn't completely ironed out the switch from playing music off a phone to making calls from the phone.

For making calls, the cell phone integration is generally good, although adding entries to the phonebook requires you to push each entry from your phone to the car. We like the system found in the Audi A5 better, which uploads the entire phone book at once.

Another extra in the tech package is a rear-view camera, although it doesn't have any helpful overlays, as found in the Audi A5. We also have to mention our fascination with the speedometer and tachometer, which both use needles that reach over from the outer rim of the dials, instead of being anchored to the front center. The effect is high-tech and cool.

Under the hood
We praised the 2009 Acura TSX's engine at the beginning of this review. This 2.4-liter four-cylinder may not sound like much, but it moved the car along adroitly while delivering an average fuel economy of 23.6 mpg for our mixed city and freeway driving. The EPA gives the car a 20 mpg city and 28 mpg highway rating, so we fell near the middle of that range. The engine also brings in a ULEV II emissions rating from the California Air Resources Board, a good achievement.


The engine isn't huge, but it works very well for the size of the TSX.

The engine gets its apparent power by generating 201 horsepower at 7,000rpm, which is right at the car's redline, and 172 foot-pounds of torque at 4,400rpm. We were happy with the accelerator response around 4,000rpm generally, but again, we have to emphasize that the six-speed close shifting manual gearbox makes a huge difference. This gearbox feels good while shifting and lets you get the right amount of power for the job at hand. We haven't driven an automatic version of the TSX, but in other Acuras with the five-speed automatic transmissions, we felt the transmission sapped any possible enjoyment you could get from the engine.


This six-speed manual transmission makes driving the TSX very fun.

When attempting a fast launch with the TSX, we found that the traction control stepped on us hard. We revved up, dropped the clutch, felt the beginnings of the launch, then the car just bogged down. The torque would have spun the wheels if the traction control hadn't interfered. And as the TSX is a front wheel drive car, it exhibits torque steer, although we found it easy to keep a straight line with a reasonable grip on the wheel.

The handling seems tuned very well in the TSX. We've noticed understeer in previous Acura models we've seen, and plenty more in Hondas, but the steering in the TSX was nice and tight, with plenty of response. The suspension is also a good mix of comfort and rigidity, letting the car handle very well in hard cornering. During normal cornering we couldn't really feel that the TSX's front wheel drive nature, although it became more apparent as we gave it the gas to pull out of a turn.

In sum
Acura doesn't really offer factory options--you buy the 2009 Acura TSX with technology or without. Our test car has a set price of $32,060, inclusive of navigation, the sound system, and all of the other tech we mentioned. A $760 destination charge runs the total up to $32,820. You pay the same amount for the automatic version, but we advise against it. You can also get the car without tech for $28,960, but you will be missing out on a lot.

We give the TSX a strong score for its cabin tech, only marred by the mediocre map resolution. In this area, the TSX keeps up with current tech, but isn't breaking much new ground. Its performance rating is also strong, as the engine manages to deliver both economy and power. We would like to see the emissions rating get a little better, as other small engine cars are earning PZEV ratings. It suffers the most on design, as the interface is still muddled with buttons. And while the car looks OK, it's not striking.


2008 Pontiac G8 GT


With a 6-liter V-8 and brawny styling, the 2008 Pontiac G8 GT looks like the return of American muscle, only, it's not. The new G8, an example of International brand engineering, actually comes from Australia, where it's called a Holden VE Commodore. These origins explain some odd styling around the cockpit, such as window and mirror controls mounted on the console and a big red display showing battery charge and oil pressure.

The central point of the G8 seems to be the big engine, not really the best peg to hang your hat on these days. The car looks good, but takes some styling cues from BMW in the heavily flared front fenders complete with vents. When we first looked at the cockpit, we thought we were in for a tech treat because of the big LCD on the stack. But the car doesn't make good use of that display space, merely showing audio information. Likewise, a voice button on the steering wheel got us looking for Bluetooth or voice command, but then we found the button merely activated OnStar.

Test the tech: 60 mph runs
As there wasn't much else to do with the 2008 Pontiac G8 GT, we decided to see how fast we could get it to 60 mph. The engine produces 361 horsepower and 385 foot-pounds of torque, numbers that seemed a little low considering the displacement. This power is fed to the wheels through a six-speed automatic transmission--there is no manual transmission option. We made our 0-to-60 mph runs in normal drive mode, sport shift mode, and using manual gear selection.


After a few runs, we stop to note down the times from our performance computer.

With our performance computer hooked up and calibrated, we put the car in drive for its first run. Stomping the accelerator gave immediate results. The tires gripped with only minimal slip, the engine roared, and we were moving. Fast. Keeping the car under control was not a problem, as it uses rear-wheel-drive and a limited slip differential. The transmission let the engine speed run up to 6,000rpm before the third gear shift, and we blew past 60 mph in 5.52 seconds. The computer also told us we had reached 30 mph in only 2.17 seconds.

We reset for the second run, this time putting the transmission into sport mode, which entails pushing it to the right, into the manual shift gate. When we launched in this mode, we got more wheel slip, but not enough to slow us down significantly. As we watched the tach needle cross 12 o'clock, it didn't seem any different than our first run, but the computer proved otherwise, showing a 0 to 60 mph time of 5.33 seconds, with 30 mph reached in 1.93 seconds.


The lack of a red line on the speedometer makes manual shifting a guessing game.

For our final run, we pushed the shifter to the manual gate and pulled it back to the put the car in first gear. We waited for the computer to calibrate then hit the gas. As the tachometer passed 6,000rpm, we made ready to shift, but before we could do it, the car bogged down as we hit redline, forcing an engine cutoff. The lack of a redline marking on the tachometer made it difficult to judge when to shift. We went through with the run, but that over-revving slowed us down to 6.75 seconds to 60 mph.

We gave it another try, figuring we would have to shift before 6,000rpm, but we were too careful, and only made 6.72 seconds to 60 mph on the second run. Figuring the automatic mode could do a better job, we called the test complete. The times this car made were impressive, and we also found it interesting that manual shift mode lets you run over the redline, as most automatics will upshift once you hit a certain engine speed even if you put it in manual mode.

In the cabin
Although plastic abounds in the cabin of the 2008 Pontiac G8 GT, we found the general design, fit, and finish very good, suitable for the top sedan in Pontiac's line-up. Of course, leather seats and steering wheel wrapping, because of our car's Premium package, didn't hurt. We particularly liked the feel of the steering wheel, with its thick and easy-to-grip circumference.


Strangely, this big LCD only shows audio information, as navigation is provided through OnStar.

However, some features of the interior didn't seem to make the transition from Australia to the U.S. For example, the Blaupunkt stereo includes a 6.5-inch LCD, plenty of room for a navigation system, but navigation wasn't present and is not offered. Instead, the car relies on OnStar for turn-by-turn directions. A large LED sits at the top of the stack, but it only shows virtual gauges for battery and oil. Another waste of very usable space, and ripe for someone to hack into an in-dash pong game.

The only real tech feature in the cabin is the Blaupunkt stereo, an impressive sounding rig with a six-disc in-dash changer and an auxiliary input on the face plate. Satellite radio or iPod integration isn't available, but the disc changer reads MP3 CDs. The interface for selecting music from an MP3 CD is decent, if a bit busy. You can see folders and tracks listed on the LCD, but it's not a touch screen. The tuning knob lets you scroll through choices and select music.


You can choose from a variety of preset equalizer levels.

This audio system uses 11 speakers, including a centerfill and two subwoofers that get power from a 230 watt amp. The stereo lets you choose from a variety of equalizer presets, such as rock and jazz. We found the audio quality to be very good, with tight bass that didn't rattle the speakers and clear highs. It's not the best system we've heard, but it is substantially better than what we've heard from most six speaker systems.

Despite the voice button on the steering wheel, you can't get Bluetooth cell phone integration on the G8, although OnStar has a hands-free calling service. You can access OnStar by either pushing the steering wheel button or using the traditional OnStar button mounted on the mirror bezel.

We found one other feature we assume to be unique to the land Down Under, a break reminder. You can set a specific amount of drive time in the car, at the end of which it sounds a chime and pops up an image of a tree and a bench, with the words Rest Reminder, on the instrument cluster display. Likewise, you can set speed warnings in the same display that will chime if you go over whichever speed you've indicated.

Under the hood
The engine in the 2008 Pontiac G8 GT gives some bragging rights; you can boast 6 liters of displacement for its V-8. But you might get a little quieter when it comes to horsepower. Its 361 horsepower is substantial, but doesn't really compare with the 400-plus horsepower some automakers, such as BMW, squeeze out of lower displacement engines. The 385 foot-pounds of torque is a more impressive specification, and helped the near 4,000 pound car hit the 0 to 60 mph times we achieved.


This big engine generates plenty of torque, but it is thirsty.

Similar to vintage American muscle, the G8 isn't the best handling car around. In cornering, the car leaned pretty seriously, but we didn't feel tire slip. Unlike that American muscle, the G8 uses a thoroughly modern suspension, including a four link independent design in the rear. The limited slip differential will also keep the power flowing to both wheels while cornering. The suspension also absorbed the bumps well without feeling soft, although we felt some float.

The steering felt reasonably responsive, although it wasn't really tight. We didn't notice an excessive amount of understeer, just the normal amount for a road-going sedan. Pontiac includes its Stabilitrak traction and stability control with this model.

We noted the difficulty with finding redline when using the manual mode for the six-speed automatic transmission. In normal drive mode, this transmission shifts early, trying to keep the engine speed low the fuel economy high. This tuning resulted in very noticeable shifts. It's smoother in sport mode as the rpms are better matched to the gear shifts. Manual shifts had that slushbox feel, and the transmission wasn't particularly tuned for sport driving. We didn't notice any aggressive downshifting on our approach to corners.

The biggest drawback with the G8 is the fuel economy. We didn't expect much from such a high-displacement engine, and our expectations were generally met. The EPA rates it at 15 mph city and 24 mpg highway. In our mixed city and freeway driving, we only made 16.4 mpg, and that was with a bias toward the freeway. For emissions, it merely meets the minimum LEV II requirement from California's Air Resources Board.

In sum
The base price for our 2008 Pontiac G8 GT was $29,310. We added the Premium package for $1,250 and the Sport package for $600. These packages added no significant tech, just many niceties such as leather and power seats. Along with the $685 destination charge, the total for our test car came out to $31,845, not a bad price if you want a big engine. In fact, there aren't too many V-8s available at this price, but there are some very nice V-6es that afford much better tech and good driving characteristics, such as the Mercedes-Benz C300.

On the cabin tech front, we can't rate the G8 very high. The one bright spot is the Blaupunkt stereo, but that is missing some key features, such as iPod integration or satellite radio. We give it credit for offering navigation and hands-free phone support through OnStar, but not as much compared with a good in-dash system. For performance tech, we like its suspension and its 0 to 60 mph times are impressive. But its poor fuel economy hurts, along with the cornering feel.